rackferro.blogg.se

Emcopy vs robocopy large files network
Emcopy vs robocopy large files network




emcopy vs robocopy large files network
  1. #Emcopy vs robocopy large files network plus
  2. #Emcopy vs robocopy large files network windows 7

This will let you know that things are doing what you want, or deleting things you down want (Mirroring) When in doubt add a /l to the end of your command and see what happens. Tee it off so you can see it, and log it W: Wait for NO MAN! Waiting doesnt change much either, and is some one going to release a file within 100 seconds? Probably not. R: Retry once, more retires wont change anything unless you are running on production hours Z: Network robust copy for drops ( Gunna slow things down) B: Usebackup mode if you dont meet ACL's XO: Only copy things that have changed on the source Robocopy source dest /copy:DATSO /S /E /XO /B /Z /R:1 /W:0 /V /TEE Log Fileĭest/copyall OR Copy:DATSO: I would go DATSO you wont need the auditing info, but if you do COPYALL is better fit then mirroring. V : Produce Verbose output log, showing skipped files. of threads to use (1-128) # default = 8 threads, not compatible with /IPG and /EFSRAW The use of /LOG is recommended for better performance. SEC : Copy files with SECurity (equivalent to /COPY:DATS). ZB : Use restartable mode if access denied use Backup mode.

#Emcopy vs robocopy large files network plus

MIR : MIRror a directory tree - equivalent to /PURGE plus all subfolders (/E) to make a backup, use the robocopy command.

emcopy vs robocopy large files network

So if you plan to copy a large number of files, e.g.

#Emcopy vs robocopy large files network windows 7

ROBOCOPY \\sourceserver\H$ H:\ /MIR /ZB /SEC /R:10 /W:10 /MT:10 /V /TEE /LOG:C:\Robocopy.log Windows 7 comes with a new version of the robocopy command that is able to copy files much faster then the normal copy command or copy function of the file explorer by using several simultanious threads.






Emcopy vs robocopy large files network